India

Are constitutional organizations crossing their ‘Lakshman Rekha’….?

Bhopal. When the government constitutional organizations, which consider our constitution as ‘scripture’ like Gita-Ramayana-Bhagwat, start crossing each other’s boundaries mentioned in the constitution itself, then what happens to that democratic country, it is hidden from anyone. No, but in our country, this unconstitutional act is going on for the last several decades and now these organizations have started accepting that they are violating the constitutional dignity, yet they are also making public announcement to continue doing so. .

The question… of constitutional scope

In a democratic country, such a situation arises only when the government seated at the center is autocratic by crossing all the constitutional limits, then only other constitutional organizations also get inspired to do unconstitutional acts and today this is exactly the same in our world’s largest society. It is happening in this democratic country, we have attained independence seventy five years ago, but in the true sense of the independent country, we have not learned the ways of running the government in a democratic way till today, after independence Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru ran the government in his own way, then came Indira ji who ran a domineering government with the help of emergency and now for the last eight years, the Modi ji-led government of the Bharatiya Janata Party is running in its own way, this is the misfortune of these 75 years. It is that till date no government has thought about the country and the countrymen in the true sense, all have fulfilled their political objectives, filled their homes and went and this government process is still going on, no matter how honest the leadership, But till the government is honest, isn’t it?

Yes…. So the subject of the basic discussion today is constitutional dignity, the basic definition of democracy is “government of the people, for the people and by the people”, but is our government and our democracy being able to fit in this scope of definition? The three organs of democracy are executive, legislature and judiciary, are these three organs finding themselves capable of fulfilling their respective responsibilities in the constitutional sphere today? Aren’t these parts interfering with each other? Isn’t the legislature (ie the government) trying to dominate the remaining two organs? Therefore, in the case of demonetisation controversy, today the judiciary has to say that “we know our limits, but still we have to take a decision after considering it.” This is the latest example. Under which the Supreme Court has served notices to both the Central Government and the Reserve Bank. Along with this, the Supreme Court also said that “it is the prime duty of the Supreme Court to hear any matter that comes before the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court”.

This is not a new or first case of conflict or legal dispute of constitutional organizations, even before this there have been disputes related to interference with the Election Commission and other constitutional organizations, right now the ‘dadagiri’ of the Center is not working on the Supreme Court or the judiciary. But there are other constitutional organizations like the Election Commission, on which the Central Government is sitting on a pedestal and everything that the government wants is being done there and only those who perform ‘Ji-Hujuri’ can be placed on the posts of the heads of these organizations. are being That is, today there is only one judiciary, where the ‘dadagiri’ of the government is not going on, the rest of the constitutional organizations are no longer concerned with the constitution or rules and regulations. Today, the mantra “Hoi Hai Wahi Jo Modi Ruchi Rakha” is being recited everywhere, whether it comes under constitutional ambit or not? It does not matter. That is why now the people of the country also have faith in the only judiciary left and the eyes of the whole country are on it.

Back to top button