What does it mean for two big leaders of BJP to remember Gandhi Nehru, Was Nehru tired of being suffocated in the government?, Access to Gandhi’s liberal ideas, Is this the message that there is disappointment in the party by raising only negative issues without doing anything for the public?, Will the voices of such discontent rise in the government and the party?, , It is worth noting that the union has also expressed concern over inflation. Some people believe that Modi has become more powerful than the Sangh. But it doesn’t seem possible. Modi bhakts are loud. The Sangh’s network is very vast and peacefully working.
There is no one in the central government and BJP like this after Prime Minister Modi and Amit Shah. They are the same from number one to ten. But after that, if you want to count, then the names of Rajnath Singh and Nitin Gadkari can be taken. Both are senior ministers. Has been the President of BJP. Rajnath Singh twice. But recently, the way both of them have expressed their views gives some idea of the turmoil going on in their mind.
First, both are in the same uncomfortable situation as Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were from 2014 to 2019. Sushma’s grief was evident many times that she was not asked in crucial matters. But where Jaitley was the chief among those who created the atmosphere to make Modi the Prime Minister and was among those running the government in the early stages, his pain was never in words even if he was neglected later. But his tiredness was visible. Initially, he was full of enthusiasm while replying to the opposition while running from Lok Sabha to Rajya Sabha. But gradually they came to understand that they are not indispensable. Many more people are being prepared to work like him. And there is not much intellectual ability in it. Ordinary ministers, politicians are also capable of doing the work in the name of Modi, which Jaitley used to do with great effort by using his sharp intellect. All paddy is twenty two passeries! As soon as Jaitley realized it, he began to relax.
It is a windfall that both Jaitley and Sushma left early. After Vajpayee and Advani, he was the brightest mind in BJP politics. Both had a decisive contribution in the 2014 victory. Sushma as the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Jaitley as the Leader of the Rajya Sabha for the entire five years from 2009 to 2014 did not allow the UPA government to live in peace even for a single day. Played the role of a very aggressive and no way out opposition. However, in today’s date, the BJP does not need any leader written like this. But later it will definitely be remembered that the party could not create an atmosphere to create other leaders like him. At present, any kind of work can be taken from any leader, minister. And why only from party people? The media also does the same thing.
Well, the situation is still the same today. Only the characters have changed. The situation of Jaitley Sushma was as before, today it has become that of Rajnath and Gadkari. And in this something is starting to come out of his mouth. What comes out is very important. Earlier, the think tank of RSS and BJP used to take immediate notice of these and consider them. But now it is not known whether there are any attention-getters left in the party and the Sangh.
Astonishingly, the opposition to the two names Nehru and Gandhi referred to in making their point of view has been the basis of the politics of the Sangh and the BJP. Before independence, the Sangh had been opposing them. Even today, BJP leaders not only blame these two for every problem of the country. Rather, the devotees started abusing them openly, from the forums, on the cameras. It is certainly surprising to remember Nehru and Gandhi positively. What did Rajnath Singh say in Jammu and Kashmir? Praised Nehru in the same Jammu and Kashmir where BJP leaders have been blaming Nehru for whatever happens. Maharaja Hari Singh did not merge Kashmir with India until 14 August 1947. On the contrary, a stand still agreement was reached with Pakistan. While Nehru, Sheikh Abdullah were pushing for the merger of Jammu and Kashmir with India. Well the latter is all history. Maharaja Hari Singh had to sign the Instrument of Accession on 27 October 1947 after the invasion by the tribals of Pakistan. But by rounding up all this history, BJP kept blaming Nehru for Kashmir. It is because of opposing everything of Nehru, what the BJP and the Sangh keep blaming Nehru for the results of the 1962 China war in which Nehru did not remain silent.
So in the same Jammu and Kashmir, the country’s Defense Minister Rajnath said that there can be no doubt about Nehru’s intention regarding the 1962 China war. Whereas till date BJP has been doubting Nehru’s intentions. To prove it to be true, Nehru’s Kashmiri Pandits convert the family to Muslims. In rumours, in publicity, so much has been written all over the net that the devotee is now blindly believing these things. There to say that I come from a particular party (meaning one who is fiercely critical of Nehru) but will not criticize Nehru gives a lot of political meaning.
Similarly, Gadkari praised Gandhi. of his political, social vision. And even said that now she is no longer politics. So he wants to leave it. So that politics is no more, that means taking Gandhi’s politics as an ideal. The same Gandhi whose killer is considered a hero by BJP MPs. And Modi says that I will never be able to forgive him from my heart. No action is taken against MP Pragya Thakur, it is considered sufficient to say that she will not be forgiven from the heart.
It is no secret that the entire BJP politics has stood against Gandhi-Nehru. In informal conversations among themselves, they will make things justifying the assassination of Gandhi. Killing is said in front of everyone. Slaughter means murder committed for some reason (justified). As many lies can be told on this. All have been spoken. Even accusing Nehru of murder. Just a few years ago, Govindacharya had demanded that the investigation into the Gandhi assassination be re-investigated. They maintain an atmosphere of suspicion.
So what is the point of two big leaders of BJP remembering Gandhi Nehru? Tired of suffocating in the government, did he reach the liberal views of Nehru, Gandhi? Is the message that there is disappointment in the party by raising only negative issues without doing anything for the public? Will the voices of such dissent between the government and the party rise further? Or the biggest question that these two leaders, who are considered to be special of the Sangh, have any indication from Nagpur?
It is worth noting that the union has also expressed concern over inflation. Some people believe that Modi has become more powerful than the Sangh. But it doesn’t seem possible. Modi bhakts are loud. The Sangh’s network is very vast and peacefully working.
Inflation has become a big issue. There are widespread reactions to the imposition of tax (GST) for the first time on things like flour and buttermilk. But Prime Minister Modi is not ready to talk about inflation, continuous fall in the value of rupee, unemployment, China’s infiltration. If this is the concern of the Sangh and that is why Rajnath and Gadkari have spoken, then some more things will soon come to the fore. This dissatisfaction has been going on for a long time within the government, the party and the Sangh. But now it seems that it is starting to come to the surface. Can’t suppress
