The last queen is because a monarchical brand like Elizabeth II may not be possible in the future. Neither in the British royalty nor in any other part of the world. In the human family of any country, democracy or dictatorship or any system like religious, the human peak of oneness like Elizabeth II is not possible. Elizabeth was a born of the twentieth century. She was a twentieth-century version of British heritage, the serial of its captivating script, characters, characters, brands. That’s when the tales of his family, the characters’ acting and the plot became a hit not only in Britain, but he was a super hit all over the world. Just like the global popularity of the serial ‘The Crown’ made by Netflix. Netflix has redeemed his phenomina with its serial. That is not possible now in future.
Therefore, the queue of those who paid tribute and the death of Queen Elizabeth II, and the world’s five-six hundred celebrities have arrived at the funeral, is proof that farewell to the last Queen of the monarchy. It became a pastime among people to become a witness to the historical occasion. Said goodbye to the brand that has human memories of the royal journey. That monarchy, through which the hearts and minds of the people ruminate in the faces, tales and tales of the king and queen.
The case of memory chewing in the human mind is strange. Every civilization in the world sees the present and the future in the jug of history. Only then those things, those styles are pleasing to the people, which create thrill, splendor, grandeur and prodigy of the story, enthusiasm and enthusiasm.
It is not in the power of any royal family, any Maharani or Maharaja to be like this. The funeral is attended by members of the British Royal Family, some 12 grandchildren of the Queen, including King Charles, Queen Consort Camilla, Ann, Andrew and Edward, European-Japanese royals including great-grandchildren, and five hundred foreign heads of state and dignitaries. As well as from US President Joe Biden to many presidents, prime ministers and heads of state.
Think, who amongst all of these could in the future hold a seventy-year-old head of power like Queen Elizabeth? It believes that the twenty-first century and the future now belong to the transient entities. The time of the decades-long rule of dictators like Stalin, Mao, Ceauescu or the King of Saudi Arabia is over. Chinese President Xi Jinping may have been weaving the fabric of being President for life, but he also cannot imagine that he will be the owner of as long as Mao Zedong. There must have been such a story. Neither democracy can keep anyone as prime minister for twenty five years, nor in a one-party system, no dictator or monarchy will keep a serial for the life of a Maharaja or Maharani.
As I mentioned earlier, London is the unofficial-undeclared capital of the world. The globalized village has the center of the changed earth. There is a fascinating story of the eight billion people of the earth, so obviously the way Elizabeth II performed her role as Queen is the essence of her virtue. She has been the center of global interest for seventy years with a natural, spontaneous gesture. For the British as matriarch, pride as power, then for the world the Queen!
Many have written extensively about what did the Queen do that made her so popular? A point of pride for the British and a point of admiration for the world? It is said that the narrators of Netflix’s ‘The Crown’ serial made the script by understanding the reality of the Queen closely. It is my belief that this serial and the popular belief that she was an idol of responsibility and duty is futile. She was doing duty till the end. He lived life in the sense of duty and not life for the enjoyment of life from the splendor of the monarchy. Such conclusions are meaningless. The top of power, the title, the glory automatically binds the powerful to a special behavior. Today, on the scale of India, Daupadri Murmu is herself a figure of power living in Rashtrapati Bhavan and 140 crore Indians in her sense the same dutifulness, scholarship, gentleness and strength of a Supreme Commander, as was understood by former President Pratibha Patil. The DNA of man has been intertwined in the unconscious for five thousand years in the glory of the chief and authority of the clan. Her heart and mind are terrific when it comes to storytelling, writing, filming, marketing and branding. Man was dazzled by the lightning of miracles even in the primitive stage. Had cheated. Even in the twenty first century one is enchanted with wonders, sorcery, splendor, glamor and all that when in front of it WOW! What’s the matter?
Therefore, the monarchy in the new millennium is also an enchanting thing. Despite this, because it is running very fast, then it was an accident that the Queen of Britain kept it alive for seventy years. This would not be possible for Britain’s new King Charles. Neither his son nor his grandson will be able to make such a splash. No matter how much marketing-branding Bankingham Palace does, its magic is about to fade away in new times.
It is a story of changing world with changing times. Hollywood, Bollywood, Netflix etc. make serials and grand films like ‘The Crown’ for story-telling, but human behavior developed in real life is flat and absolute. Japan has a monarchy and the Japanese have great faith and belief in it, similarly Arab countries have Islamic monarchy, Chinese Communist Party has made Xi Jinping a god, Slavic tsarism has made Putin and Hindus have made Prime Minister Narendra Modi incarnate. But these are all transient ephemeral characters of time. These characters, because human nature, the character of citizens do not cook and do not leave a deep impression, then they will be characters that have come in history. All this in total, only Alexander of time.
If you want, you can understand this thing with the example of King Charles, the new Maharaja of Britain. What will he be able to do in his behavior as a king, which will make a deep impression on the culture, behavior, character life of the British? In the seventy years, whatever the empress of decency, honesty and character rites, or any impression of genuine behavior, made by the Queen, her virtue became permanent in the public. She was deeply respected from house to house by the white British. She was not a divisor in the society. There was no face of fear and wickedness. There were no lies. She was not looking for knowledge unnecessarily. Despite the magnificence of the palace, she did not show arrogance and pride. Despite marketing-branding, she did not impose herself. Obviously, he set himself an example and made an impression on his society-politics and public life.
The impression of King Charles like that is not possible. Nor is it possible for any king or queen or head of state in the world to be like that. In this way too the meaning of My Last Queen is deep.
