I sympathize with the Sangh Parivar, their pracharaks, their grassroots Panna Pramukhs, allied organizations like Mazdoor-Farmer-Swadeshi and Saraswati School, sincere volunteers working from the North-East to Kerala. You might be surprised by this. You can ask, everyone is eating the cream of power. The Sangh chief is roaming under the security of the Z category. Luxurious offices are being built. Who used to eat gram-peanut. They used to come and go by rail, they are eating cashew-almonds, they are traveling by plane. They are neither poor nor without power. The faces have become red. Meaning, power is the doorman of the door, so what is the point of winning with power?
Then just consider Nitin Gadkari. Leave it on old faces like LK Advani, Dr. Murlimanohar Joshi and outside campaigners like Togadia, Govindacharya, Sanjay Joshi. Forget the Swadeshi Movement, Mazdoor Sangh, Kisan Sangh, ABVP etc. The campaigners-volunteers who are consumed in the organizations. Forget those campaigns, leaders, workers of Sangh-BJP in North-East who were carrying saffron flag while fighting Congressmen like Hemanta Biswa Sharma. Instead of all this, consider their symbol and Modi-Shah’s volunteer Nitin Gadkari of Mohan Bhagwat. Honestly think that Gadkari or Bhagwat is understanding the country and its governance in the political, economic, social thinking of their Idea of India? Will you be happy with Modi’s policy?
What Mohan Bhagwat said on the issue of reservation, Swadeshi, Akhand Bharat, Hindu-Muslim in the concern of the country, did Modi-Shah work even an inch on it? It is a waste that Ram Mandir was built. Sangh’s dream came true with the work of abolishing Kashi-Mathura-Ayodhya and Article 370. These things have zero meaning. Because the first thing in the imagination of Hedgewar, Golwalkar, Deoras, Mohan Bhagwat was to organize Hindus. Then the country of Hindus had to be made modern, powerful, as solid nationalist as America, Germany, Japan, Israel have become according to Savarkar’s political Hindu philosophy. They grew up with sticks due to the religious fanaticism of Islam, but Hindus like them fanatics, superstitious, black magic, sorcerers and devotees living in the pretense of religion, became fools, this was neither the purpose of this idea nor the roadmap. No Hindu thinker (from Aryasamaji to Malviya, Savarkar, Karpatri etc.) said that instead of making a Hindu intelligent and capable, true, make him devotee and fool with false propaganda. Make Hindus as Maulana, Islamic Caliphs and dictators make Muslims.
I have strayed. Nitin returns to Gadkari. He is Savarkar, a volunteer of the Deoras tradition. Capable-intellectualist, philanthropist and truth-speaker. Fraudsters are not liars. Not timid but men. Those who divide the society are not the ones who connect. Those who work by standing upright with the spine. Those who keep their point of view in the cabinet. With the stubbornness of Swadeshi, even while listening to the Dhannaseths, but keeping them confined within the scope. Raised from grassroots politics and in Jamaat means Sangh Parivar pracharaks, volunteers, those who keep the doors open for all citizens of Hindu-Muslim. Working for everyone as much as possible. It is said that in the last eight years, Modi-Shah did not do even five percent of the work done by Nitin Gadkari in supporting the work of the Sangh’s institutions, from buildings to their arrangements. Modi-Shah spent like water in contesting elections with money, electoral donations, building party buildings- buying votes-MLAs-MPs, getting defections. No money or project was made for any creative, social, or cultural work. Government budget, CSR budget did not get an intellectual (not at the global level, not even national level) work of the Sangh’s idea with intellectual force in the old government institutions. The Hindu intellect was either made a languri or a field of mutual battle!
There may be some redundancy in my analysis. But you also think that in the last eight years, what Modi-Shah has made his own rhetoric and Nitin Gadkari quietly acted, then what does not make the difference and guess the end result? Modi-Shah has spoiled the character of the Hindu idea in such a way that neither democracy has benefited nor has a name in the world. Hindu politics is getting tarnished. L
I’m lost again. The basic thing is that whatever the Sangh wanted, its so-called ideals means political correctness, political honesty-character-movement-face-character, morality, culture-indigenous, socialism, values does not end in the mud of Modi government’s power. has been? Can the Sangh claim that its factory produces true, cultured, fearless, capable Hindus and not power-greedy, hungry and fearful Hindus?
It is my belief that the experience of eight years has now formed the idea in Mohan Bhagwat, Sangh that the power has to be brought on the line. Narendra Modi-Amit Shah run their government but the BJP organization is not to be allowed to be their JB. JP Nadda’s term ends in November. If a new president is elected, it will be by the decision of the union. That’s when Modi-Shah smartly reconstituted the Parliamentary Board and the Election Committee in advance. So that even if the new president is elected by the choice of the union, he should remain in the status quo of the committees. It is quite possible that before that, two or three faces like Nitin Gadkari should be dropped from the cabinet reshuffle so that the message is created that no organization and its people have any position in front of the Prime Minister’s chair! The power and the prime minister’s chair is big and the Sangh and their volunteers carry its palanquin!
