Main Stories

Modi’s CBI, ED and the rule of whites and Mughals, their Kotwal!

What is the number one sin of Narendra Modi’s rule? Its belief is to rule over Indians in the same way as the British did. Divide and rule Secondly, to intimidate the opponents of power with power and the police. Calling them anti-nationals and corrupt. I expected third independence from Modi in 2014. I did not even dream that Narendra Modi will create fear in the opponents from the Red Fort that I will not leave. The truth of history is that the emperor of the Red Fort used to rule by intimidating the Hindus. Both the Mughals and the British had made such rules and regulations of police and police, so that the Kotwal of Chandni Chowk was the number one tool of governance. Due to the fear of him, all used to remain the slaves and devotees of the emperor. The Mughals and the British ruled by dividing the subjects into two parts. The emperor used to take decisions in the faces of two categories of supporters and opponents. Those who were supporters of the emperor or the British would have given them money and tribute. Taking care of the expenses of the army (in today’s context election donations). Such people were free to arbitrarily. He used to get the tag of being honest, patriot from the court. Just like the ministers, courtiers, changed leaders may have been corrupt in Modi’s rule, but CBI, ED, Kotwal, police do not have the courage to do anything against them. Raid them.

It is the truth of history that the one whose Delhi and the owner of the Red Fort are considered as the owner of India. Whoever was the owner of Delhi, he did not tolerate any other powerful, popular leader in the country. The Mughals and Britishers of Delhi controlled the whole country with their agents, police, kotwals and army. The British built zamindaris in this style. When he was threatened by a Hindu king like Uddhav Thackeray, he created panic in his court by horse-trading through a local agent. reversed his power. Gave the zamindara of the princely state to a subordinate like Eknath Shinde. The Mughalia of Delhi, Aurangzeb, got angry with Chhatrapati Shivaji because they were hooked to live in their subjects and their independence. How could Aurangzeb, who considers himself the emperor of the whole of India, tolerate such a mood?

The brutality with which Aurangzeb shredded the princely states of Bengal, Maratha, Deccan from Delhi, the basic difference between the history of that time and today is that Narendra Modi’s personal power is everything from monopolistic hunger, while religion drives Aurangzeb. was. He was a true servant of Islam. He destroyed the temple. Converted many people. He lived in simplicity. Not by words, but by deeds, he painted India in the Islamic flag. Whereas the reality of 2022 is only about personal power. In words and appearances, Hindus are only to be wooed. You have to create the illusion that I am everything! If I have raised the tricolor, then here is the saffron religion flag.

However, this is a different matter. It is the truth of the thick slavery era and today’s democratic India that the princely states, feudatories, self-respecting-freedom Hindu heroes and opposing forces of Mewar or Maratha, Jhansi, Awadh etc. were always pricked by the Delhi Sultanate. The attitude of Mughal and British Delhi was the same as that of today’s nationalist Narendra Modi. I am the master of the whole country. And the basic need to guarantee the continuity of my power is to divide and rule. Terming the opposition as such a defamatory, corrupt, anti-national, so that the public does not understand the other option. Eliminate those people and their leaders, their parties, who are in danger in 2024 or 2029.

What was the purpose of British rule in Delhi? First the earnings of the company and then the defense of the Queen’s India Kohinoor. How did this work? Through kotwals, agents in the provinces, zamindars and through the terror of CBI and kotwals, they made their power, monopoly. It was in the British system that those laws and regulations of police, CBI were made, of which in independent India these were by-products – new laws like DRI, MISA, TADA, ED and their systems. Rowlatt Act, Sedition Act, Press Act, CBI were all made by the British, so that they would not be opposed. Don’t stand in opposition. People don’t ask for freedom.

But the white British were still the slaves of British democracy. That’s why with the changing times, they allowed opposition to form in India. An Englishman himself formed a party named Congress. Donated to Congress. allowed to collect money. Swadeshi movement. People were allowed to form parties. Allowed the anti-partisans to hold dharna-demonstration-movements. Congress, Hindu Mahasabha, RSS, Muslim League used to take money or donations from all the Seth-Birlas and people who eat and drink. Used to do politics. The British used to do like this. The British were civilized. They knew that politics is run by money. And when they collect money legally by collecting money themselves and collect the income and expenses, then what is wrong if the leaders of the opposing parties and tribes of poor India are collecting money. Therefore, if Gandhi is collecting expenses by swindling Birla-Bajaj Seth, then it would be a sin that the CBI raids Gandhi’s ashram or raids on Hedgewar’s whereabouts of Congress party leaders, Muslim League-Hindu Mahasabha, RSS Nagpur office. With the recovery of money and papers, make an argument that look, look, Gandhi takes money from Birlas, while pretending to be a saint-mahatma! These native people are corrupt, what will Indians get by taking freedom under their command?

Only then think, in the 75 years before independence and 75 years after independence, how many billion rupees cash money or donations, election-political expenditure would have been collected by the parties of India from the people? Were not Congress, Sangh, Jan Sangh, BJP doing politics and social service by taking cash money, number two money? It is possible that many people have eaten money in this, have done personal corruption. But in 150 years, which British ruler of Delhi, Congress Hakim or Jana Sanghi (Prime Minister Vajpayee) has become such a head of the nation, who has adopted this method by taking the opposition subedar, the king, the opposition party, the opposition that I am legally in power while in power. But (currently through electoral bonds of elections) I will create a Kuberi treasury worth thousands of crores but will neither allow the opposition to take money nor keep it? Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, because they know the game of money closely, would have assumed power, in the pretense of electoral reforms, created such a system of electoral bonds that by doing the work of billionaires, luring them and threatening them, then the powerful with a check of billions of rupees. One can arrange election expenses by taking payment. The public, parliament, media no one knows which Seth gave how much money to BJP or Delhi’s ruling party. Think what a clever and corrupt donation policy of 75 years. Does any Seth dare in this policy that he will donate to the opposition parties at par with the ruling party! Only then, during the rule of Modi-Shah, billions of rupees were donated to the BJP and a lot of money to the rest of the parties!

Think, what a wonderful arrangement Modi Raj made to make the opposition not fit for politics. Whereas from above, with his immense election expenditure, the needs of the opponents increased. But from where did the money to fight politics and elections come?

Don’t let the opposition collect money from bonds and donations. And if someone takes cash, collects it, then by getting raids done by CBI and ED, getting their records checked and making them naked in front of the public. So that the public does not believe in him as a tainted, corrupt man.

am i wrong? In the governance policy of the Mughal emperor living in the Red Fort and Narendra Modi, who gave a speech from the ramparts of the Red Fort, there is not an inch space for the opposition. When a fight is not just a means of election, then what will you fight? Force Rana Pratap to eat grass bread, crush the Maratha hero Shivaji with such strength that they stop fighting and raid. Stop the money of those states, those princes who seem to be of hostile mood.

The truth of India is Delhi has always ruled with arrogance. In the idea of ​​the British and the Mughals also, there was an all India national mission to collect the land of India, to enslave everyone. What was its number one tool? Shakti (money and stick), yaki kotwal. The British created the Delhi Act that gave birth to the CBI and the foundation of agencies like the ED. But yes, then there was no pretense of democracy. Now even in a democracy, if the opposition does not have the power to contest elections with money (because no other way is left), then it should sit at home or become a slave of power.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has added a new dimension this 15th August. While addressing the Chandni Chowk (country) from the Red Fort, he says, listen, my Kotwal will not leave! I will clean up the politics. Opponents are corrupt. All those subedars, chief ministers and parties are anti-national, corrupt and family-oriented, who are not afraid of me. Not my slave Not loyal to me, while I am the real owner of 140 crore people. Listen to me and people of India, I am honest, worthy, patriotic and my opponents are dishonest, worthless, anti-national.… Think this development of India of 75 and a new way to kill opposition and opposition in the new Amrit Vela!

Shubham Bangwal

Shubham Bangwal is a Senior Journalist at Youthistaan.com You can follow him on Twitter @sb_0fficial
Back to top button
error: Content is protected !!